GCSE · Physics · AQA · Spec 8463

Different half-lives of radioactive isotopes (physics only)

Same number of radioactive nuclei. One sample's half-life is minutes, the other's thousands of years. Which is more dangerous? The honest answer is 'it depends', and here's why.

Same nuclei, different half-life: watch the danger change shape

061218240306090120Time (days)Activity (decays per second)24.0 decays/sActivity at the startdrag the small dot ↔
Half-life 4 days

Half-life: 4 days. Activity at the start: 24.0 decays/s

Every curve starts with exactly the same number of unstable nuclei. Only the half-life changes. The small dot sits one half-life along the time axis, so the activity there is always half the starting value. Drag it left to shorten the half-life: the same nuclei now decay in less time, so far more decay every second. At 1 day the curve is a tall spike that has almost died away within a week. Drag it right: the start drops lower, but the curve stays up for far longer. (An illustrative sample: the numbers show the pattern, not a real isotope.)

Watch out: A long half-life doesn't mean 'more radioactive'. At 8 days, this sample starts at a quarter of the activity it has at 2 days. It lasts longer. It isn't fiercer.

Time scale

Half-lives of different radioactive isotopes are spread right across this axis, from well under a second to billions of years. It's a logarithmic scale: each tick is 10 000 times longer than the one before. Tap a dot to see what a half-life that long would mean.

0.01 s100 s10⁶ s10¹⁰ s10¹⁴ s10¹⁸ sTime in seconds (log scale: ×10 000 per tick)

A second

1 s

With a half-life of one second, one minute is already 60 half-lives: the activity has halved 60 times, to less than a billion-billionth of where it started.

What do you really think?

Which one is more dangerous?

Two radioactive samples start with the same number of unstable nuclei. Sample S has a half-life of a few minutes. Sample L has a half-life of thousands of years.

Which is closest to what you think right now?
How sure are you?

Exam line: Don't rank by half-life alone. Say which is more intense, which lasts longer, and over what time.

Your turn to explain

Write it, then mark it

Two radioactive sources contain the same number of unstable nuclei. Source A has a short half-life. Source B has a long half-life. Explain why the hazards from the two sources are different. [4 marks]

0 words · your answer stays on this page and is not sent anywhere.

WHAT YOU'VE LEARNED

A quick recap of today's lesson.

Why a short half-life and a long half-life are dangerous in completely different ways.

What you need to know

  • Half-lives of radioactive isotopes range from well under a second to billions of years.
  • Short half-life (same number of nuclei): high activity at first, but it falls away quickly.
  • Long half-life: lower activity, but it lasts a very long time.
  • So the hazard depends on the half-life: intense and brief, or weaker and long-lasting.

The big picture

Radioactive isotopes have an enormous range of half-lives, from well under a second to billions of years. For the same number of unstable nuclei, a short half-life means the decays are crammed into a short time: a high activity that dies away quickly. A long half-life spreads the decays out: a lower activity that lasts a very long time. That's why the hazard from radioactive material depends on the half-life involved.

Key points

1Radioactive isotopes have a very wide range of half-lives, so they're best compared on a logarithmic (×10 per step) scale.
2Start two samples with the same number of unstable nuclei. The one with the shorter half-life decays in less time, so more nuclei decay each second: its activity is higher.
3A short half-life material is a big hazard straight away, but its activity drops quickly, so the hazard doesn't last.
4A long half-life material has a lower activity, but it stays radioactive for a very long time, so the hazard carries on.
5A longer half-life is not simply 'more dangerous', and a shorter one is not simply 'safer'. Always say how intense and how long-lasting.

Worked example

Problem

Two sealed samples, A and B, start with the same number of unstable nuclei. A has a half-life of 6 hours. B has a half-life of 30 years. Which sample is the bigger hazard during the first day, and which is the bigger hazard over the next ten years?

⚠ Watch out

Saying 'the longer the half-life, the more dangerous' (or 'the shorter, the safer'). For the same number of nuclei, a longer half-life means a lower activity that lasts longer. A shorter one means a higher activity that dies away sooner. Always say both parts: how intense and how long.

🧠

Memory hook

Short half-life: sharp and short. Long half-life: low and long. Same box of matches, either struck all at once in one blinding flash, or one at a time all night.

✓

Check yourself

Sample M has a 20-minute half-life; sample N, 500 years. Both start with the same number of unstable nuclei. Which starts with the higher activity, and which is still a hazard a year later? Why?

Flashcards

(6)
How wide is the range of half-lives of radioactive isotopes?
Enormous: from well under a second to billions of years.
Same number of nuclei: what happens to the starting activity if the half-life is doubled?
It halves. The same decays are spread over twice the time (compare the graph at 2 days and at 4 days).
What is the hazard from a short half-life material like?
Intense but brief: high activity at first, falling away quickly.
What is the hazard from a long half-life material like?
Weaker but lasting: lower activity, but it stays radioactive for a very long time.
Is a longer half-life simply 'more dangerous'?
No. It's longer-lasting but less intense. Half-life tells you the kind of hazard, not just how much.
Why are half-lives shown on a logarithmic scale?
Each step multiplies the time, so values from fractions of a second to billions of years fit on one axis.

Tap any card to flip it, or use Study as deck to go through them one at a time. In the full lesson these run as a spaced-repetition deck — you rate each card Hard, Good or Easy and the tricky ones keep coming back until they stick.

Learning with Lightbulb is opening soon

You can use this lesson now. Join the waitlist and we'll let you know when the full Lightbulb experience is ready.

Keep me posted

More AQA GCSE Physics topics

See the full AQA Physics curriculum →

How this lesson was checked. This AQA GCSE Physics (specification 8463)lesson was published through Lightbulb Learning's human-designed editorial process — the educational standards, accuracy rules and publication checks it must pass were authored and approved by Philip Halpin. It passed subject-specific assessment, automated educational checks and technical publication verification before going live (publication checks completed 29 September 2026). Published pages are monitored, human spot-checking is ongoing across the lesson library, and anything found wrong is corrected or withdrawn. How our lessons are made and checked. Spotted a mistake? Email hello@lightbulblearning.co and we'll review it.

Helpful guides for parents and students